| Contact |
Sustainable Energy Research Group
Faculty of Engineering and the Environment University of Southampton
Address
Highfield
Southampton
SO17 1BJ, UK
Telephone
+44 (0)23 8059 2051
Fax
+44 (0)23 8067 7519
Email
serg@soton.ac.uk
more details
|
|
a |
Resource assessment forms part of the
design process for an array of tidal stream generators - as indicated in
the flow diagram in Figure 1 - and consists of the following tasks:
Selection of sites suitable for
placing of tidal stream generator arrays. This is primarily constrained
by a minimum value of mean cube flow speed (For a fixed generation
efficiency, this value will be proportional to the average power output
for a single turbine.); and a suitable range of depths for a particular
type of generator. Site selection will also be constrained by
integration with the power distribution network and environmental
impact.
Initial sizing and rating of
the generating device to maximize energy extracted over the life of the
device taking into account factors such as the long term variations in
flow speed; deviation of the flow from rectilinear movement; vertical
profile of flow velocity.
Investigation of different
arrangements of generators within the selected area given the device
parameters above, in order to maximize combined power output. Revision
of generator parameters if necessary.
Investigation of the
geographical extent of significant effect of the proposed tidal stream
generator array on tidal parameters (extracting tidal energy in one
location may lead to a reduction in available energy elsewhere). If
necessary, corrections made to power output estimates due to resulting
changes in boundary conditions.
Table 1 lists methods for generating tidal
flow data for use in resource assessments. 1, 2 and 3-D models can also
be used to assess the effect of the generator arrays on the tidal
regime, whereas previous assessments have used empirical corrections to
flow values in the natural state to take account of the effect of
multiple generators.
|
|
 |
Fig. 1 - Processes involved in assessing the optimal power output of a tidal stream generator array. |
|
|
Table 1 - Modelling of tidal stream generator arrays in order of increasing complexity: advantages / disadvantages according to approach.
|
Tidal flow data
|
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
|
Nearest representative values from navigational charts
|
Simple, data easily obtainable.
|
Inaccurate over large areas and with sparse
data. Corrections made for effects of generators can only be
included empirically.
|
|
Interpolate between data points
|
Simple, more accurate than above.
|
Doesn’t account for changes in flow due to depth and other effects.
|
|
1D model
|
Simple, suitable for ‘fences’ of generators across well-defined channels. May be solved analytically.
|
Not suitable for complex topography. Can not simulate flow acceleration between generators.
|
|
2D numerical model
|
Well established for coastal tidal modelling. Energy extracted through added roughness.
|
Increasing computational expense. 3-D Wake
structure not simulated. Requires tuning and validation.
|
|
3D numerical model
|
Can simulate wakes of turbines and include vertical velocity profile.
|
Complex. Currently suitable only for highly
localized models. Data may be lacking on turbulence
quantities.
|
|
Table 2 - Tidal stream energy resource for five sites in the Channel Islands according to three different reports.
|
.
|
|
Black and Veatch, 2004
|
Joule 2, 1996
|
ETSU, 1993
|
| Tidal Race |
Area
|
Max. Speed
|
Rated Power
|
Load Factor
|
Rated Power
|
Load Factor
|
Rated Power
|
Load Factor
|
|
.
|
km²
|
m/s
|
MW
|
%
|
MW
|
%
|
MW
|
%
|
| Race of Alderney |
102
|
4.4
|
394
|
49
|
1973
|
44
|
2407
|
23
|
| Casquets |
190
|
2.6
|
538
|
35
|
370
|
50
|
2943
|
13
|
| NW Guernsey |
222
|
2.1
|
170
|
33
|
422
|
54
|
2186
|
22
|
| Big Russel |
59
|
2.6
|
101
|
43
|
219
|
47
|
1001
|
22
|
| NE Jersey |
58
|
3.1
|
57
|
33
|
196
|
45
|
1179
|
13
|
|
|
|
Assessments of the tidal stream energy
resource have taken the form of desktop studies, produced using
navigational data, for the purpose of providing government and industry
with broad estimates of the economic potential for the development of
tidal stream power.
Recent assessments of tidal stream energy resources around
the UK have estimated the exploitable resource, when averaged over a
year, in the range 2 - 7 GW, which may be compared to an average
electrical power consumption in the UK for 2005 of 46 GW (Digest of UK energy statistics 2006).
There is considerable uncertainty attached to these resource estimates,
however; all of the assessments to date have either ignored the change
in flow conditions due to the effect of the generating devices, or have
been based on more or less arbitrary proportions of kinetic energy flux
through a site.
The results from three reports for the five key sites in the Channel Islands (shown in maps.live.com)
are shown in Table 2 above. This clearly highlights a large discrepancy
between reports and a need to make more accurate estimates of the
resource.
Portland Bill on the South coast of the UK (view in maps.live.com)
is a promising site for tidal stream energy, with high tidal stream
velocities of up to seven knots (3.6 m/s) around the headland. Although
the area with high tidal streams is smaller than other proposed sites in
Scotland or the Channel Islands, the location is closer to population
centres than these sites.
In order to produce high resolution data on tidal
streams, independent of navigational charts, a 2D tidal hydrodynamic
model of this promising site has been produced using the TELEMAC system.
The model was forced by tidal elevations around the outer boundary and
the results validated using tidal elevation records at Weymouth (within
the model domain) and tidal diamonds from the relevant Admiralty charts.
One of the finite element meshes used for the model can be seen in
Figure 2, along with the bathymetry of the area. Some of the results of
the model can be seen in Figure 3 and the animation of tidal flows
around the headland below.
Work has been published in:
Blunden L.S. and Bahaj A.S. (2006) Initial evaluation of tidal stream energy resources at Portland Bill, UK. Renewable Energy, Volume 31, Issue 2, February 2006, pp 121-132. view paper
For example tidal data, simulation
results around Portland Bill have been used, this site has a significant
swing from the 180º flow reversal, allowing comparisons between fixed
orientation and yawing devices. The variation of depth-averaged speed
over 28 days from the simulation is shown in Figure 4.
The T_TIDE package for MATLAB was used to determine
the constituent ellipse properties by harmonic analysis, in which nodal
corrections were applied, based on the central time of the input time
series. Based on the solved constituents, predictions can be made from
any start date with any time step. For the predictions in this paper,
the tidal stream speeds and directions from the start of 2006 for 18
years have been generated at one minute intervals. A hodograph showing a
forecast for 18 years is presented in Figure 5 and first 5 days are
shown to demonstrate a typical cycle. The ellipse is offset south due to
the constant flow component. This and the constituents with inclination
close to 0° or 90° cause the tidal stream to swing away from
rectilinearity.
Some marine current turbine concepts do not turn to
face the tide and instead rely on the tidal stream at the site to be
bi-directional. Thus the rotor orientation is fixed but the blades are
able to twist through 180 degrees capturing the energy by running the
generator backwards. For this case direction is also important. The east
and west directions is presented in Figure 6. This averaged data set
provides a basis for comparing designs of turbines based on know device
characteristics and for use in optimisation studies.
|
|
 |
Fig. 2 - Part of a finite element mesh used for
modelling tidal flows around Portland Bill, with sea bed elevations in
metres above chart datum (scale on right). Co-ordinates are OSGB
National Grid.
|
|
 |
Fig. 3 - Tidal flows around Portland Bill
headland. Colour scale is in m/s and vectors show direction and
relative magnitude of the velocity field. Rectangle shows the
approximate area with highest average flow speed (actually highest mean
cube speed).
|
|
 |
Fig. 4 - 28 day prediction for speed and direction from TELEMAC simulation.
|
|
 |
Fig. 5 - Hodograph showing direction and
strength of the tidal flow. The first 5 days are the black lines and the
shaded gray area represents the full 18 year forecast.
|
|
 |
Fig. 6 - Binned data set showing a
histogram of the times in the east and west. (Red denotes higher number
of hours). The bins are defined by 1° intervals and in cubed speed
steps of 1 m3/s3 from 0 to 35 m3/s3 and averaged data over 18
years.
|
|
|
|